Intellectual Merit Award 2026
Memory and Legacy - Base Year: 2025
ATTENTION
If you received a nomination email for this Honor,
you will need to be signed in to the site (the Sign in / Join button in the header), with the same email
at which you received the nomination notice, so that the button
"ACCEPT NOMINATION" appears.
(the button will be located near the end of this page, just before the Terms of the Call)
The Brazilian Academy of History and Literature (ABHL) hereby announces the Institutional Call for Nominations for the 2026 Intellectual Merit Award — Memory and Legacy (Base Year: 2025), intended to recognize thinkers, researchers, writers, essayists, and scholars whose intellectual production, throughout the base year of 2025, has shaped debates, influenced communities of thought, and established lasting references in the field of ideas.
Placed within ABHL's honors architecture at the Memory and Legacy level, this Award has a classic, selective, and annual nature, aimed at consecrating that which has endured: the intellectual contribution that transcended the moment, resisted superficiality, and established itself as a consistent, responsible, and formative reference.
ABHL understands that intellectual merit is measured by depth, coherence, reflective impact, and the capacity to guide collective thought. For this reason, the Awards are reserved for those works and trajectories that, during the period under review, have demonstrated intellectual maturity, conceptual rigor, and cultural relevance.
By its nature, the Intellectual Merit Award is exclusively by nomination, and self-application is not permitted. The proposal must be submitted by a third party and subjected to academic assessment, in a procedure conducted with rigor, discretion, and institutional verification, preserving the reputation of the nominee and the seriousness of the rite.
It is an honorary and institutional recognition, conferred by a cultural Academy, based on criteria of intellectual merit, reflective impact, and ethical integrity.
TARGET AUDIENCE
The 2026 Intellectual Merit Award is intended for personalities whose intellectual work, in the base year of 2025, has produced relevant effects in the field of thought, regardless of the medium used (books, articles, essays, lectures, research, qualified public interventions, or applied theoretical production).
Without restriction, the following may be nominated:
• Writers, authors, and essayists of critical thought;
• Researchers and scholars with relevant intellectual production;
• Philosophers, theorists, historians, and thinkers in the humanities;
• Public intellectuals whose work has raised the level of debate;
• Producers of applied knowledge with conceptual depth;
• Authors whose work has influenced intellectual, educational, or cultural communities.
ABHL's areas of activity are included, understood as legitimate fields of intellectual production and critical reflection, including, among others:
• Letters, Literature, and Language Studies;
• History, Memory, Genealogy, and Cultural Heritage;
• Philosophy, Theology, and Humanities;
• Arts, Aesthetics, and Cultural Production;
• Education, Formation, and Pedagogies;
• Social Sciences, Culture, and Community Action;
• Law, Justice, and Legal Thought;
• Communication, Media, and Public Opinion;
• Science, Research, Technology, and Innovation;
• Health, Psychology, and Medical Humanities;
• Public Policy, Governance, and Institutional Relations.
In conferring the Intellectual Merit Award, ABHL seeks to:
• Recognize intellectual works that have elevated public debate through depth, rigor, and responsibility;
• Record contributions that became references during the period under review, forming part of the institutional memory;
• Value consistent thought as a cultural, formative, and civilizational asset;
• Distinguish serious intellectual production from circumstantial opinion;
• Preserve trajectories and works that guide generations, strengthening society's intellectual heritage.
RULES
To preserve the institutional seriousness of the honors rite, the rules below apply:
Truthfulness and consistency
The nominator declares that the information and evidence presented are true, verifiable, and sufficient to support the proposal.
Mandatory evidence
The nomination must contain verifiable elements: records, publications, portfolio, reports, certifications, news articles, official links, and/or formal statements; in the case of a project, a clear description of actions and results is required.
Merit criteria (basis of the Review):
The Evaluation Committee will consider, among other aspects:
Consistency of intellectual production;
Conceptual and methodological rigor;
Reflective, educational, or cultural impact;
Relevance to the intellectual community;
Ethical integrity and public reputation.
Prohibitions (immediate denial)
Nominations will not be accepted:
with defamatory content or without supporting evidence;
with false, manipulated, or unattributed materials;
whose purpose is direct commercial advertising, without demonstrated merit.
Discretion and reputational protection
ABHL conducts the procedure with confidentiality, avoiding undue exposure. The internal proceedings seek to protect both the nominee and the nominator, keeping the rite to an academic standard.
Honor Granted

HONOR EXCLUSIVELY BY NOMINATION
Laurels conferred by nomination are exclusive in nature and cannot be submitted by the candidates themselves;
The nomination must be made by a third party and will be submitted for consideration by the Evaluation Committee;
Only after formal approval by the Evaluation Committee may the nominee express acceptance of the honor;
Acceptance is made by the Nominee on this website (MENU > HONORS > Nomination Acceptance), by entering the Acceptance Token Code or through the Member Area (you must be logged in to the website with the email address that received the notice of the nomination’s approval).
Modalities













Benefits






Criteria






Testimonials



BOTÃO ACEITAR
Se você recebeu um e-mail de indicação para essa Honraria,
você precisará estar logado no site (botão Entrar/Cadastrar no cabeçalho), com o mesmo e-mail
em que recebeu a comunicação da indicação, para que este botão acima "INDICAR ALGUÉM"
apareça como "ACEITAR INDICAÇÃO".
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can be nominated?
People and initiatives with verifiable results in 2025.
Who can nominate?
The nomination must be made by a third party. ABHL values nominators who can describe the merit clearly and present consistent evidence.
Can the nominee apply on their own behalf?
No. This Honor is exclusively by nomination.
Which elements carry the most weight in the evaluation?
Consistency, integrity, and real, verifiable impact: benefit generated, relevance to the community, coherence between activity and the nominated area, and ethical reputation.
Is there any prohibition that causes immediate denial?
Yes: defamatory content, lack of supporting evidence, false/manipulated/unattributed material, and nominations intended as direct commercial advertising, without demonstrated merit.
What happens after the nomination is submitted?
There is screening and preliminary verification. When applicable, the nominee will be invited to register their ACCEPTANCE, allowing the Committee to proceed with the technical analysis and the issuance of the Review.
Why is there an Institutional Fee? When does it apply?
It is formalized after the nominee's ACCEPTANCE and enables institutional certification, academic registration, and the administrative processing of the conferral and documentation.
Is the process public?
ABHL conducts the procedure with discretion and to an institutional standard, preserving the reputation of the nominee and the integrity of the rite.
TERMS OF THE CALLINTELLECTUAL MERIT AWARD 2026Memory and Legacy — Base Year: 2025
I — Purpose
To establish the rules for the receipt, analysis, and conferral of the Intellectual Merit Award 2026 — Memory and Legacy (Base Year: 2025).
II — Nature of the Honor
The Award is an honorary and institutional distinction, conferred by academic deliberation.
The Award does not constitute professional certification, nor does it replace accreditations, professional boards, or professional registrations.
III — Eligibility and Scope
People whose intellectual production in the base year of 2025 demonstrates relevance, impact, and consistency may be nominated.
The honor is exclusively by nomination, submitted by a third party.
IV — Nomination and Documentation
The nomination must contain an objective description of the merit and documentary evidence compatible with the nature of the nominated activity.
ABHL may request additional materials or clarification when necessary.
V — Process Stages
In general terms, the procedure is as follows:
a) Receipt and document screening of the nomination;
b) Preliminary validation of consistency and category fit;
c) Nominee's acceptance (a condition for proceeding, when applicable);
d) Technical analysis and institutional research;
e) Deliberation and issuance of the Technical Review;
f) Formal notice of the result;
g) Final formalities and institutional registration.
VI — Results
The result may be:
Granted (honor approved), or
Denied (honor not conferred in the cycle under review).
VII — Declarations and Responsibilities
The proposer declares the truthfulness of the content submitted.
The nominee, upon accepting to proceed, authorizes the institutional processing and may be asked to validate information necessary for registration.
VIII — Institutional Fee (after ACCEPTANCE)
Once the nominee's ACCEPTANCE is confirmed and after the signing of the HONOR CONFERRAL AND ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT, the Institutional Fee will be formalized, intended to cover institutional certification, academic registration, and the administrative costs of the conferral and documentation process.
This stage applies only to processes that advance to formalization, enabling the issuance and provision of official documents.
IX — General Provisions
Matters not covered herein will be resolved by the competent bodies of ABHL.
A full reading of this page is recommended before submitting the nomination.

